SIM Swap and Port-Out Fraud
Hijacking a customer's phone number through a fraudulent SIM change or carrier port, to intercept SMS codes and recovery messages, usually just before a high-value withdrawal.
What it is
A phone number is an identifier you don't control. Your customer rents it from a carrier, and the carrier's retail stores, call centers and dealer channels can reassign it. When a fintech uses that number for sign-in codes, password reset or "is this really you?" confirmations, the carrier's account-security process becomes part of the fintech's authentication.
- SIM swap. The number is moved to a new SIM or eSIM at the same carrier.
- Port-out. The number is transferred to a different carrier.
Both cut off the victim's service (often the first sign) and send SMS and voice to the attacker. They are typically one step in a targeted Account Takeover (ATO): the attacker already has the password or recovery email, and the phone number is the missing factor. Compare MFA Bypass and OTP Interception, which covers other ways to get the code.
How it works
The FBI described the main routes to reassignment in 2022:
- Social engineering of carrier staff, with the attacker posing as the customer.
- Insiders: carrier employees paid to perform the swap.
- Phishing of carrier employees to get access to systems that process swaps.
After the swap, the attacker uses SMS for password reset and recovery, and intercepts SMS one-time codes, to take over accounts. Targets are chosen for value. Public crypto holders, executives and people in leaked customer databases are overrepresented.
Transaction footprint
Look for a fast sequence of events: phone change at the carrier, then SMS-based reset, then contact changes, then the biggest withdrawal the account allows.
| Stage | What you see in the data | Decision point |
|---|---|---|
| Swap or port | Not visible to you directly. Only a carrier signal shows a recent SIM change or port. | Check phone-change recency before trusting SMS |
| Reset | Password reset or recovery via SMS from a new device; sometimes a recovery-email takeover first | Secure Account Recovery Design; don't let SMS alone authorize recovery |
| Control | Email change, new device enrolled, 2FA method changed, notifications redirected | Contact Change Cooling-Off Periods |
| Staging | New withdrawal address, bank link or receiving broker; whitelist changes | Hold new destinations; Bank Account Ownership Verification |
| Cash-out | Large crypto send, wire or ACH; ACATS out; liquidation then transfer | Withdrawal and Payout Controls; step-up with a non-SMS factor |
| Aftermath | Victim reports no service, then calls from a borrowed phone; the carrier confirms the port | Fast freeze; preserve evidence for law enforcement |
Common variants
| Variant | What's different | Where it shows up |
|---|---|---|
| In-store or call-center swap | Social engineering with fake ID or stolen account details | All carriers |
| Insider-assisted swap | Bribed employee or contractor | Carrier retail and support |
| eSIM transfer | Carrier account compromised online, then eSIM moved to the attacker's device | Carriers with self-service eSIM |
| Port-out | Number moved to another carrier using stolen account PIN or data | Prepaid and postpaid |
| Phone theft plus SIM use | Physical theft of an unlocked device; SIM used for codes | Opportunistic; often paired with passcode observation |
| Executive or high-net-worth targeting | Victims pre-selected from public or leaked data | Crypto, brokerage, wealth |
Where it shows up
- Crypto and brokerage. High balances, irreversible or slow-to-recover exits, and a history of SMS-based 2FA. See Brokerage and Investing and ACATS Transfer Fraud.
- Neobanks and P2P. The phone number is often the primary identifier, so reassigning it reassigns the account. See Neobanks and Consumer Fintech and Payments and P2P.
- Rewards and marketplaces. Phone-number login and SMS recovery let attackers take over accounts and redirect payouts. See Payout Redirection.
Impact
FBI IC3 SIM-swap reports have been falling while losses per incident stay high:
| Year | Complaints | Reported losses |
|---|---|---|
| 2018–2020 (combined) | 320 | ~$12 million |
| 2021 | 1,611 | ~$68 million |
| 2022 | 2,026 | ~$72.7 million |
| 2023 | 1,075 | ~$48.8 million |
| 2024 | 982 | ~$26.0 million |
- Complaints to the FCC about the crime doubled from 275 in 2020 to 550 in 2023 (AP reporting).
- In absolute terms it is rare. Microsoft's 2024 Digital Defense Report put SIM swapping at under a third of one percent of identity attacks (as cited secondarily). But it concentrates on high-value targets.
- In the largest alleged case, federal prosecutors charged three people in early 2024 over a SIM-swap scheme that allegedly enabled the theft of more than $400 million in crypto from one company, which Bloomberg and others identified as FTX. See Case Study - FTX Theft via SIM Swap (2022).
Red flags
- A recent SIM change or port on the phone of record, from a carrier or phone-intelligence signal (Phone Risk Signals)
- SMS-based reset followed by contact or 2FA changes (Account Change Events)
- A new device right after a reset, with no history (Device Fingerprinting, Login Anomalies)
- Withdrawal to a new destination within hours of the changes (Payee and Counterparty Risk, Fast In Fast Out Patterns)
- The customer calls from a different number saying their phone "stopped working" (Customer Contact Signals)
Prevention and detection at a glance
| Layer | Control or signal | What it does here |
|---|---|---|
| Prevent | Passkeys and Phishing-Resistant Authentication | Removes the phone number from the authentication path |
| Prevent | Secure Account Recovery Design | SMS alone can't recover an account holding value |
| Prevent | Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) | Push customers from SMS to app-based or hardware factors |
| Detect | Phone Risk Signals (SIM-change and port recency) | Downgrades trust in SMS when the number recently moved |
| Detect | Risk-Based Authentication and Step-Up | Steps up with a non-SMS factor for high-value actions |
| Respond | Contact Change Cooling-Off Periods, Withdrawal and Payout Controls | Holds money movement after phone, email or 2FA changes |
| Respond | Customer Support Verification Protocols | Your own support isn't the next weak link |
Emerging variants and adversary adaptation
-
Carrier-side rules. The FCC adopted its SIM Swap and Port-Out Fraud Order on November 15, 2023. It requires wireless providers (including resellers) to use secure customer authentication before SIM changes and ports, notify customers immediately of requests, offer free account locks, train staff, bar inbound-contact employees from customer data until the customer is authenticated, and keep records for three years. The rules took effect January 8, 2024, except the information-collection provisions. On July 5, 2024, the Wireline Competition Bureau tied all compliance deadlines to completion of OMB's Paperwork Reduction Act review and a later Federal Register notice. At the time it estimated OMB approval would come no earlier than late November 2024. OMB approved on January 15, 2025, but as of October 2026 the codified SIM-change rule (47 CFR 64.2010(h)(9)) still says compliance isn't required until a compliance date is added, and we found no Federal Register notice setting one. Treat the rules as adopted but not yet enforceable, and carrier-side protection as uneven.
-
The attack moves online. As in-store checks tighten, attackers move toward carrier online accounts (self-service eSIM transfer) and toward carrier insiders. The carrier's own account-takeover problem becomes yours.
-
Falling complaint counts. IC3 complaints fell from the 2022 peak, consistent with the shift from SMS to app-based factors at crypto platforms. The remaining incidents are targeted and high-value, so a lower count doesn't mean lower risk.
-
Phone number as identity. Products that use the phone number as the account identifier or the passwordless login method stay exposed. Carriers also reassign numbers in the normal course of business, so plan for recycled numbers as well as hijacked ones.
-
What's next. Expect attackers to combine number takeover with recovery-flow abuse at email providers and with voice cloning against your support line (Generative AI and Deepfake Fraud).
Related mechanisms
- Account Takeover (ATO): the hub
- MFA Bypass and OTP Interception: other ways to get the code
- Account Recovery Abuse: the reset path SIM swaps usually feed
- Insider Fraud: carrier-side and your-side insiders
- Payout Redirection and ACATS Transfer Fraud: common exits
Real-world examples
- Case Study - FTX Theft via SIM Swap (2022): alleged $400M+ crypto theft enabled by a SIM swap; DOJ prosecution.
- AP reporting in July 2024 described a journalist whose number was ported out. Within days, $19,000 was wired out of her bank account, and it took ten days to recover the number.
Sources and further reading
- FBI IC3 PSA I-020822-PSA (Feb 2022): routes to SIM swap; 2018–2021 complaint and loss figures
- SIM swap fraud statistics compiled from IC3 annual reports: 2022–2024 IC3 complaints and losses (vendor compilation; verify against IC3 PDFs)
- Federal Register: SIM Swap and Port-Out Fraud Order (Dec 8, 2023): requirements; effective date; compliance-date mechanism
- FCC: Protecting consumers from SIM swap and port-out fraud: adoption at the November 15, 2023 meeting; compliance-date language
- TLP: FCC amends SIM swap compliance date (July 2024): July 5, 2024 order tying compliance to OMB review
- Nelson Mullins: CPNI, Privacy, Cyber Security and TCPA Update (Feb 2025): OMB approval January 15, 2025; compliance notice still pending
- Cornell LII: 47 CFR 64.2010: paragraph (h)(9) still defers compliance until a compliance date is added
- NBC/AP: What is port-out hijacking?: victim account; FCC complaint counts; waiver
- The Block: DOJ charges trio over $400M SIM swap: indictment summary
- NIST SP 800-63B-4: PSTN as a restricted authenticator; SIM-change risk indicators
- Wikipedia: SIM swap attack: secondary citation of the Microsoft DDR 2024 share